Legal Opinion
Ramapo Bank v. Bechtel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 7, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
224 N.J. Super. 191 (1988)
539 A.2d 1276
THE RAMAPO BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PAUL BECHTEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DANIEL REBISH, DEFENDANT.
PAUL BECHTEL, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTHONY TROBIANO, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 7, 1988.
Decided April 7, 1988.
Before Judges DREIER and BAIME.
Michael DeMarrais argued the cause for appellant (Browne, Buckalew & DeMarrais, attorneys; Michael DeMarrais, on the brief).
Daniel Kinburn argued the cause for respondent (Williams, Caliri, Miller & Otley, attorneys; Daniel Kinburn, of counsel and on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- D'ippolito v. CastoroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Economic Dev. v. Pavonia ResturantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.