Legal Opinion
Klinick v. 66 East 80 Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isidob Wassebvogel,
Spec. Ref. This is a consolidated action. The four actions it comprises are:(1) An action hy defendants Barr and Patrick against defendants 66 East 80 Realty Corp., Fidelity and Deposit Company *912of Maryland and Arr-Em Plastering Corp. for: (a) foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on the premises 66 East 80th Street, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York; and (b) work, labor and services rendered and materials furnished;(2) An action by plaintiff Kliniek against defendants 66 East 80 Realty Corp. and Park East 80th Builders Corp. to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spence v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Brainard v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Szemko v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Kalt Lumber Co. v. SternerNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Blanchard v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beaumont Birch Co. v. Najjar Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Strober Bros. v. Kitano Arms Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996