Legal Opinion

Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by plaintiff Steinhardt to amend the remittitur granted, return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of .the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiff’s causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiff of due process of law.

On the court’s own motion, in Rosenberg et al., return of the remittitur…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. MeehanSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Fleishman v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Germantown Central School District v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Barresi v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API