Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Gerowitz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2011No. 49A05-1005-CT-296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Dr. James Thompson appeals judgment entered against him and in favor of Amy Gerowitz, individually and as the surviving spouse and personal representative of the Estate of Martin Gerowitz (collectively “the Appellees”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Issues

Dr. Thompson raises two issues, which we reorder and restate as:

I. whether the trial court properly denied his motion for judgment on the evidence; and

II. whether the trial court properly denied his motions to strike a juror, to question her further, or for a mistrial.

Facts

Martin died during…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amanda Ping v. Margaret Inman, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Tammi Clark, as personal representative of the Estate of Kandace Pyles v. Samer Mattar, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Tammi Clark, as personal representative of the estate of Kandace Pyles v. Samer Mattar, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Tracie Easler v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API