Legal Opinion
State v. Hardy
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided April 13, 1989No. 01-88-01010-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
The sole question in this appeal is whether Texas Revised Civil Statute Annotated article 2372h-12 (Vernon Supp.1989) (“article 2372h-12”) is constitutional.
The 70th Texas Legislature enacted article 2372h-12, which requires Commission ers Courts in populous counties to develop and establish avenues to review employee grievances concerning wages, hours, or conditions of work. This article protects employees, through review by a district court of appropriate venue, against retaliation for resorting to the established grievance procedures. The Harris County Commissioners…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Spring Branch I.S.D. v. StamosTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- State Board of Insurance v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Renken v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Martinez v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Harris County v. Louvier, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Austin Pickett v. Housing Authority of the City of Killeen, Texas and Cecil C. Carter, Jr., in His Official Capacity, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.