Legal Opinion

Camp v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 4, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint for bastardy, brought to the Borough Court of Wallingford and thence by a binding-over to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County, and tried to the court, Hubbard, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHameeseey, J.

There is no sufficient reason for this appeal. Bastardy proceedings are regulated by Chap. 83 of General Statutes. . By a special Act (Special Laws of 1886, pp. 225, 232), the jurisdiction and powers given under the general law to ,a justice of the peace and a justice court in bastardy suits are vested in the Borough Court of Walling-ford and in the judge and deputy-judge thereof. This complaint was originally brought to that court, and its deputy-judge administered the oath required and signed the warrant of arrest, in pursuance of the authority given him by the special Act. The process was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Shumate v. BisignanoDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API