Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Burke

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided January 10, 1895Published

1Opinion of the CourtPugh, J.

The questions for decision in this ease arise upon demurrers to the petition of the plaintiff and the amendment to it.

A history of the case, as it is given in the pleadings, does not seem necessary. Í shall only mention the relevant master facts, and they are few.

Three railroad corporations were consolidated into one and called The Columbus, Hocking Valley and Toledo Railway Company. The directors were Messrs! Burke, Greene, Charles Hickox, Chas. G. Hickox, Ellis, Mc-Kinnie and Chauncey H. Andrews; Greene being also president, and Burke vice-president. Burke, Charles Hickox and McKinnie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Wood v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Barry v. . LambertNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API