Legal Opinion
Virtuoso v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 2, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the defendant is required to defend and indemnify Gennaro Virtuoso and Domenica Virtuoso in a negligence action brought against them by the plaintiffs herein, pursuant to a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to Gennaro Virtuoso and Domenica Virtuoso, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered May 30, 1986, which, inter alia, held that the defendant’s disclaimer of insurance coverage was invalid and required it to defend and indemnify Gennaro Virtuoso and Domenica Virtuoso.
Ordered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Allstate Insurance v. FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Allstate Insurance v. FurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Winstead v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Allstate Insurance v. MarconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hovdestad v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Platsky v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. FarrautoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.