Legal Opinion

Becker ex rel. Stull v. Yeager

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1896No. Appeal No. 26PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal No. 26, Nov. T., 1895, by tbe Nuding Brewing Co., from order of C.' P. Schuylkill Co., confirming the report of John F. Dolphin, auditor to distribute the fund arising from the sheriff’s sale of the real estate of Joseph Yeager. Exceptions to auditor’s report.

Read the full summary

Appeal No. 26, Nov. T., 1895, by tbe Nuding Brewing Co., from order of C.' P. Schuylkill Co., confirming the report of John F. Dolphin, auditor to distribute the fund arising from the sheriff’s sale of the real estate of Joseph Yeager. Exceptions to auditor’s report. A fund of $1,204.88 being realized by sheriff’s sale of defendant’s property and there being a number of lien creditors, who failed to agree on a scheme of distribution, the fund was paid into court and referred to an auditor for distribution. The fund being insufficient to pay all creditors, the auditor awarded payment down to…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

A fund of $1,204.83, arising from the sale of the real estate of Joseph Yeager, was brought into the court below for distribution. As to this fund there were practically four claimants, the aggregate of whose judgments was more than sufficient to exhaust it. These claimants being unable to agree among them - selves, an auditor was appointed to make distribution of the fund. After a careful examination of the judgments of the several claimants and considerable testimony as to the judgment of Emma Yeager, he made distribution—after deducting the costs of the audit,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. May's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. McCormick v. McGonigalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API