Legal Opinion · Dissent

Painter v. Shaner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1984No. 08-84-00136-CVPublished

1DissentStephen F. Preslar, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. The Relator has made a proper application and should not be denied a place on the ballot. A writ of mandamus lies to compel party officials to accept a proper application of the candidate and to place his name on the ballot. Baker v. Porter, 160 Tex. 488, 333 S.W.2d 594 (1960); Ferris v. Carlson, 158 Tex. 546, 314 S.W.2d 577 (1958); Cantrell v. Carl*359son, 158 Tex. 528, 314 S.W.2d 286 (1958); McClain v. Betts, 95 S.W.2d 1311 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1936, no writ); Friberg v. Scurry, 33 S.W.2d 762 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1930, dism’d w.o.j.); Clancy v. Clough, 30 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baker v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ferris v. CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Parker v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Roy v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Cantrell v. CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API