Fascio v. Department of Police
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentLove, J.
|XI respectfully dissent with the majority’s amendment of the Civil Service Commission’s (hereinafter “the Commission”) decision.
The appointing authority must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the complained-of conduct occurred and that the conduct impaired the efficient operation of the entity (legal cause). Barquet v. Department of Welfare, 620 So.2d 501, 505 (La.App. 4 Cir.1993). “In reviewing the Commission’s findings of fact, the court should not reverse or modify such a finding unless it is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.” Lombas v. Dept. of Police, 467 So.2d 1273,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walters v. Dept. of Police of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Bannister v. Dept. of StreetsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Cole v. MurrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cure v. Department of PoliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Branighan v. Department of PoliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.