Legal Opinion · Concurrence

R. M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 22, 2001No. 97-3346, 97-3347Published

1ConcurrenceMcKEE, Circuit Judge

I join part II B — The NCAA’s Relationship with the NYSP — fully, and without reservation. However, I concur with the discussion in part II A — Controlling Authority Theory only because I agree that we are bound by the panel’s decision in Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 198 F.3d 107 (1999, 3rd Cir.) (McKee, J. dissenting). See I.O.P. 9.1 (“no subsequent panel overrules the holding in a published opinion of a previous panel.”).

Inasmuch as I have previously noted why I believe that the decision in NCAA v. Tarkanian, 488 U.S. 179, 109 S.Ct. 454, 102 L.Ed.2d 469 (1988)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. TarkanianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Tai Kwan Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API