Legal Opinion

Franklin Bank v. St. Louis Car Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 6, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by an indorsee against the maker to recover on a $10,000 promissory note. Tried to a jury, the verdict was for defendant, plaintiff appealing from the judgment entered thereon.

It is unnecessary to summarize the petition further than to state that it is an ordinary action on a note. The amended answer is a general denial, and a plea that plaintiff did not receive said note before maturity and for value, but after maturity and without adequate consideration and with notice that the note was subject to defenses.

The amended answer further avers that, on September 19, 1919,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. McMullinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Vermilye & Co. v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Foley v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Julian v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Cutler v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ragen v. BennigsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Seifert v. SeifertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Lepori v. HilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Jefferson Trust & Savings Bank of Peoria v. W. Heller & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API