Legal Opinion · Dissent

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Webster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 2002-1996Published

1DissentMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 4} I agree with the majority’s interpretation of Gov.Bar R. V(ll)(F)(4)(a)(ii). The rule does require us to impose identical or comparable disciplinary measures unless a substantially different sanction is warranted.

{¶ 5} It is also true, however, that Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(6) permits this court to enhance the sanction if an attorney fails to report to the Disciplinary Counsel and to the Clerk of the Supreme Court that he has been subjected to discipline in another jurisdiction. According to the record, Webster did not notify this court of his disbarment in Rhode Island.

{¶ 6} Webster’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WebsterOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API