Legal Opinion

Horman v. Liquor Control Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1968No. 10933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs seek to restrain the advertising of light beer as permitted by Regulation No. 4 of the defendant Liquor Commission and to have that regulation declared void; whereas the Commission and the intervenor, Galaxy Outdoor Advertising, Inc., seek to have the regulation declared valid. From the granting of defendant’s motion for a summary judgment, plaintiffs appeal.

The pertinent provisions of the questioned Regulation No. 4 are these:

B. Light beer may be advertised in any reasonable manner consistent zvith the public interest, subject to the follozmna…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bird & Jex Co. v. FunkUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stevenson v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cowan v. Westland Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Davis v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API