Horman v. Liquor Control Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs seek to restrain the advertising of light beer as permitted by Regulation No. 4 of the defendant Liquor Commission and to have that regulation declared void; whereas the Commission and the intervenor, Galaxy Outdoor Advertising, Inc., seek to have the regulation declared valid. From the granting of defendant’s motion for a summary judgment, plaintiffs appeal.
The pertinent provisions of the questioned Regulation No. 4 are these:
B. Light beer may be advertised in any reasonable manner consistent zvith the public interest, subject to the follozmna…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bird & Jex Co. v. FunkUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Stevenson v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Cowan v. Westland Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Davis v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1972
- Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980