Legal Opinion

Rayner v. Pharis & Pharis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1978No. 6806Published

1Opinion of the Court

CUTRER, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS

The defendant-mover, James F. Rayner, former administrator of the Succession of Elmer Rayner, moves to dismiss the appeal of the intervenor, Pharis & Pharis, on the grounds that the intervenor’s appeal is now moot.

We agree and dismiss intervenor’s appeal.

Decedent, Elmer Rayner, left a will which was admitted to probate on February 2, 1978, and a petition for appointment of an administrator was filed on May 9, 1978, *92to which was attached a detailed descriptive list.

The detailed descriptive list listed the property of decedent, Elmer Rayner, as totaling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. McCoy v. Pacific Coast Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. Meaux v. HoffpauirLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Hebert v. HoffpauirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API