Legal Opinion

Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens v. Bland

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 19, 1991No. Civ. A. 88-0123-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILSON, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by five non-profit agencies that are authorized recipients of funds under Title III of the Older Americans Act (“OAA” or the

“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3001 et seq. (Supp. 1991), against the Commissioner of the Virginia Department for the Aging (the “VDA”), Thelma Bland (“Bland”), alleging that Virginia’s intrastate funding formula for the 1990-1991 fiscal years fails to comply with the requirements of the OAA primarily because the formula allegedly fails to reflect the proportion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Hughes v. Region VII Area Agency on AgingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  3. Southwest Missouri Office on Aging v. Missouri Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  4. The City Of Chicago v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API