Legal Opinion

Bee, Inc. v. Pizor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1935No. Appeal 538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This was an action in assumpsit by the plaintiff, formerly Bee Automobile Co., to recover from the defendant, who conducts a number of moving picture theatres, the purchase price of certain motion picture equipment. It was made up of two claims. One, for $29.33, for two Samson transformers, was not disputed. The other, for $1,600, for a complete theatre talking picture equipment, was contested by the defendant. We shall confine our discussion to this disputed claim.

In its amended statement of claim the plaintiff averred that it was, on or about February 4, 1929, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raphael v. W. Pa. Amusement Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pryor's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Bee, Incorporated v. PizorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API