State v. Finn
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. F. G. Johnston, Judge. (1) The court did not err in overruling defendant’s motion to strike out all of the evidence adduced by the State, regarding a certain revolver used and introduced in evidence.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. F. G. Johnston, Judge. (1) The court did not err in overruling defendant’s motion to strike out all of the evidence adduced by the State, regarding a certain revolver used and introduced in evidence. The information charged defendant with the crime of robbery and with robbing William Conner of and stealing from him a certain revolver, the property of said William Conner, and the evidence moved to be stricken out was offered for the purpose of identifying and proving the value of the property described in the information and was clearly competent for…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
On the third day of January, 1905, the prosecuting attorney of Lawrence county filed an information, duly verified, wherein he charged the defendant, together with Fred Herron, Arthur Herron and Otis Herron, with robbery-in the first degree in Lawrence county on the ——— day of December, 1904.
The defendant was arrested and arraigned and entered his plea of not guilty and was granted a severance. At the March term, 1905, he was tried and convicted, and his punishment assessed at a term of nine years in the pententiary. His motions for new trial and in arrest were duly filed and overruled and an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- State v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RippeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910