Demarey v. Brugas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
These two actions were brought by guests of the defendant Brugas, who were riding in his automobile driven by him, when it came into' collision with a bus in the intersection of Kossuth and Clarence streets in Bridgeport. The complaints alleged that the bus was one of the busses of the Gray Line Bus Corporation; and that the collision occurred because of the negligence of Brugas and of the driver of the bus, as proximate causes of the collision, and the cases were tried together by consent of the parties. The Gray Line Bus Corporation moved that the verdicts against it should be set aside as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Howell v. J. Mandelbaum & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Cupo v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Middletown Trust Co. v. BregmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Doty v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Voegeli v. Waterbury Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Scalora v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Halpine v. HalpineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.