Legal Opinion

Council for Urological Interests v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 10, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2009-0546Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL FOR UROLOGICAL INTERESTS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 09-00546 (HHK) KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Council for Urological Interests (“CUI”) brings this action against the United States and Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–706, and the Regulatory…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API