Legal Opinion

Satheeskannan Senthinathan v. Attorney General United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 28, 2013No. 12-1353UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STARK, District Judge.

Satheeskannan Senthinathan (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying Petitioner’s motion to reconsider or reopen a final order of removal. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition for review.

I

As we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with the record, we limit our discussion of the background to only what is necessary for our resolution of the issues on appeal.

Petitioner is a native and citizen of Sri Lanka.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Olufemi Yussef Abdulai v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Igli Filja, Luljeta Filja, Endrit Filja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Pllumi v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Satheeskannan Senthinathan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API