Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division v. District Court In & For the City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 17, 1990No. 89SA462PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum

The State of Colorado, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division (the Department); John J. Tipton, Executive Director thereof; and Guy Meyers, a hearing officer thereof, collectively termed “the petitioners,” seek relief in the nature of prohibition, pursuant to C.A.R. 21, to prohibit the respondent District Court in and for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, from exercising jurisdiction over a civil action filed by Daniel L. Schneller (Schneller) against petitioners. Having issued a rule to show cause, we make the rule absolute.

A, On March 23, 1989, shortly after 10:30 p.m., while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Talbot v. School District No. 1, DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State Department of Revenue v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zamarripa v. Q & T Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. Meyer v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Foos v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicles Division, Hearings Section v. District Court, in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Amalgamated Transit v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API