Legal Opinion

Gabbert v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2018No. S-17-0253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Doyle Eugene Gabbert, was convicted of eight felonies following a bench trial. He contends the district court erred in determining that he failed to prove he was not guilty by reason of mental illness or defect. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Appellant presents one issue:

Did the district court err when it held that Mr. Gabbert had failed to prove that he was not guilty by reason of mental illness or defect?

FACTS

[¶3] Appellant committed a series of crimes over the course of three days in August 2016, while on parole from a lengthy prison sentence. On August 10, 2016,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SilmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. RoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. State v. FlakeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States v. Dwayne FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheldon Scott Buckingham v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Jett Garriott Adams v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Solomon Preston Bolen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Anthony Rodriguez v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API