State v. Enloe

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction under Act 134, page *221175, of 1890. He relies upon seven bills of exception, in which as correctly stated in his bfief, three points of law are raised, and these he summarizes as follows:

“First. The trial court erred in ruling that it was not necessary, under Act 134 of 1890, for the defendant to have taken the complainant to a house of ill fame or other place of like character.

“Second. The trial court erred in ruling that at the time of the alleged offense, the complainant was a woman of previous chaste character, in spite of uneontradicted…