Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1904No. 2866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and fined $100. The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss- the appeal because the recognizance does not comply with article 887, Code Crim. Proc; First, it does not state that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor “in this cause,” and it is not made to appear in what cause he was convicted; second, it is more onerous than the law provides, in that it requires him to make his “personal” appearance; third, because it states “until discharged by due course of law,” instead of “not depart without leave of this court.” The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boulding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API