Legal Opinion

(PS) Estrada v. Martin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 7, 2019No. 2:19-cv-02115Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK RUDOLPH ESTRADA, No. 2:19–cv–02115 JAM KJN (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP AND DIRECTING SERVICE 13 v. (ECF No. 2) 14 MATT MARTIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Estrada, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, has requested leave to 18 proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

(ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application in 19 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 20 §1915. Accordingly, the Court grants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API