Legal Opinion
State Division of Human Rights v. County of Oswego
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to Human Rights Appeal Board for further proceedings; cross motion for order of enforcement denied. Memorandum: The record supports the finding of the Division of Human Rights that petitioner was guilty of an act of unlawful discrimination against complainant because of his age. The order must be modified, however, by striking subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the second ordering paragraph. Although public employers are not excluded from the requirements of the Human Rights Law, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Schenectady v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- New York City Department of Personnel v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- New York City Department of Personnel v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. Human Rights Commission of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Sears v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- County of Westchester v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993