Legal Opinion

Floyd TUTSON, Et Al., Appellants, v. Tom UPCHURCH, Jr., Tom Upchurch, Jr. & Associates, and Wayne Barfield, Appellees

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 12, 2006No. 07-04-00525-CVPublished

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing

2Per curiam

Pending before the court is a motion for rehearing of Tom Upchurch, Jr., Tom Upchurch, Jr. and Associates, and Wayne Barfield (Upchurch and Barfield). Movants inform us that we engaged in “a complete misconstruction of what occurred” when reversing the summary judgment entered below. Furthermore, the “complete misconstruction” involved our application of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 11 to the circumstances depicted in the record. There was no agreement between counsel implicating Rule 11, they continued. Rather, the “statement of concession by” appellants’ counsel was…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. VidrineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Johnson v. BackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API