Legal Opinion
(PS) Moses v. Municipality City of Redding
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 13, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00434Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT B. MOSES, No. 2:18-cv-00434 MCE AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MUNICIPALITY CITY OF REDDING, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and the action was accordingly referred to the undersigned 18 by Local Rule 302(c)(21). The case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary 19 judgment. ECF No. 31 (defendant’s motion), 32 (plaintiff’s motion), 33 (defendant’s opposition). 20 For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Paul D. Gibbs v. Robert J. Hopkins Pat LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.