Legal Opinion

Ward v. Diebold, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 4, 1986No. 85-13, 85-14PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, Donna G. Ward, appeals from a judgment which was in her behalf but which awarded zero damages. Defendants, Diebold, Inc., and Diebold International Sales Corporation, cross-appeal. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Plaintiff purchased an old, locked Diebold-Kienzie safe at an estate sale in Mobile, with the hope or expectation that it contained valuable items. Plaintiff contacted the local Diebold manager, Michael Hardegree, Sr., to arrange to have the safe opened.

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged fraudulent representation, breach of contract, negligence, and conversion. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Automotive Acceptance Corporation v. PowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. Treadwell v. TillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Monteleone v. Trail Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Luker v. City of BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Clements v. Lanley Heat Processing EquipmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Shoals Ford, Inc. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Odom v. Mississippi Valley Title Ins.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Downs v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API