Legal Opinion
Fujimoto v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1958No. Nos. 13915, 14320PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
These cases from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington involve defendants convicted of violation of the Smith Act.*
We would affirm the trial courts principally under the authority of Yates v. United States, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 146, although there are some additional points here. But our decision in Yates is no longer the law. It was reversed on June 17, 1957, by the United States Supreme Court, 354 U.S. 298, 77 S.Ct. 1064, 1 L.Ed.2d 1356, which also took the further step…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Wellman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. James E. Jackson, Sidney Stein, Fred Fine, Alexander Trachtenberg, William Norman and George Blake CharneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Charles Kazuyuki Fujimoto, Dwight James Freeman, Jack Wayne Hall, Eileen Toshiko Fujimoto, Jack Denichi Kimoto, John Ernest Reinecke and Koji Ariyoshi v. United States of America, Henry P. Huff, Terry Pettus, John Shields Daschbach and Paul Miller Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Harriet Bouslog Sawyer, a Member of the Territorial Bar of the Territory of Hawaii, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.