Kasper v. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUND
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1ConcurrenceColeman, J.
I write separately because I would use a slightly different analytical approach to reach the same ultimate conclusion as the *589Court: that Kasper has satisfied the statutory requirements for an accidental disability pension.
I
The task of construing N.J.S.A. 18A:66-39(c) is made easier when the statute is broken into component elements. Petitioner had to establish the following elements to be entitled to a disability pension: (1) she was under 65 years of age, (2) she is permanently and totally disabled, (3) her permanent and total disability was directly caused by a traumatic event, (4) the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Fernandez v. BARUCHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Kulas v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Coleman v. Cycle Transformer Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Russo v. TEACHERS'PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.