Legal Opinion

Gerald v. Quam

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for new trial by defendant Quirk Quam. Ann Fitz Gerald sued Charles Quirk Quam and Mary L. Quam, his wife, for damages for her slander

1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.

The point is strongly urged upon me that, having denied the motion for a nonsuit, at the trial, upon the authority of another judge at the cir*29cuit, I should continue to follow that decision, and deny this motion without further examination. I should be glad if this were so. But, as the object of allowing motions for new trials to be made upon the minutes, is to afford a cheap and speedy review of rulings at the circuit, that they may be corrected, if wrong, I feel compelled to examine this question upon its merits.

The defendant, Mary L. Quam, is the wife of the defendant, Charles Quam. She…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kowing v. . ManlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Hall v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muser v. LewisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1884
  2. Brainerd v. WhiteThe Superior Court of New York City · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API