Legal Opinion
Gurganus v. GUARANTY BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 9, 1957No. 103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The two papers sued on, purporting to be promissory notes as alleged, were offered by plaintiff and admitted in evidence. On each the name “Mary Gurganus” appears as maker, after her name the word “ (Seal) ” appears and under the caption “Witness” the name “J. I. Gray” appears. On the back of each purported credit entries appear.
It was admitted by plaintiff’s counsel “that the body of the notes, other than the signatures, as well as the alleged credits written on the back of the notes, are all in the handwriting of the plaintiff.”
The first issue was directed solely to the alleged execution…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- King v. Bynum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Pettiford v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Bank of Union v. StackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Pearce v. BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Germer v. PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Key v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.