Legal Opinion

International Exch. Bank v. Pullo

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 4, 1922No. 3796PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Acting Associate Justice.

This case was begun in the municipal court, with the International Exchange Bank as plaintiff, and Vincent Pullo as defendant. It was brought as a landlord and tenant proceeding to recover, possession of certain real estate situate within the District of Columbia. A trial was had, and judgment was entered against the plaintiff. This proceeding in error was thereupon begun to secure a reversal of the judgment.

At present there are two controlling questions which appear in the case. The first one arises from the fact that during the pendency of this proceeding in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klepinger v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Howenstein Realty Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Sambataro v. CaffoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  4. Sekulow v. 11th & F St. Valet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Dysert v. Ring Management Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API