Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowlby v. Mayor of Dover

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1902Published

1DissentPitnuy, J.

This case was before the court on a former occasion, when only the officials of the so-called “city government” of Dover were parties defendant. It was then decided that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed because the officials of the “town government” were necessary parties, without whose presence in court no' judgment against the municipality should be pronounced. Bowlby v. Dover, 35 Vroom 184. Since that decision, and before entry of an order of dismissal, the proceedings have been amended by joining the mayor, recorder, alderman and common councilmen of Dover, and that corporation,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. State v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API