Legal Opinion
Colombe v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 18, 2013No. CIV 11-3002-RALPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Charles Colombe, a shareholder, director, and officer of BBC Entertainment, Inc. (“BBC”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Rosebud Sioux Tribe (“the Tribe”), Rosebud Sioux Tribal Court, and Judge Sherman Marshall (collectively “Defendants”). Doc. 1. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 48; Doc, 58. Colombe’s motion for summary judgment seeks…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Missouri River Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bruce H. Lien Co. v. Three Affiliated TribesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Maynard Bernard v. Casino Magic Corp., a Minnesota Corporation Casino Magic American Corp., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- First American Kickapoo Operations, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Multimedia Games, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bettor Racing, Inc. v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. ColombeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016