Legal Opinion

DR Partners v. Board of County Commissioners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. 31999PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

The appellant, DR Partners, a Nevada General Partnership, dba Las Vegas Review Journal (the “Newspaper”), operates a newspaper of general circulation in Clark County, Nevada. The respondents are the Clark County Board of Commissioners, individual members of that board, and two managerial employees of county government (the “County”).

The district court denied the Newspaper’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking disclosure of unredacted records documenting use of publicly owned cellular telephones. It did so under the County’s claim of confidentiality based upon…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on Behalf of Judiciary Committee v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-JournalNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Reno Newspapers, Inc. v. HaleyNevada Supreme Court · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API