Legal Opinion

Pandit v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 6, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01343Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GRISH PANDIT, ET AL. * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 23-1343 QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE * SECTION “T” (2) COMPANY ORDER AND REASONS Pending before me is Plaintiffs Grish and Minakshi Pandit’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint to add a demand for a jury trial. ECF No. 26. Defendant QBE Specialty Insurance Company (“QBE”) timely filed an Opposition Memorandum, and Plaintiffs timely filed a Reply. ECF Nos. 28, 30. No party requested oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 78.1, and the court agrees that oral argument is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. George Farias v. Bexar County Board of Trustees for Mental Health Mental Retardation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Jess F. Rhodes v. Amarillo Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Daniel International Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API