Legal Opinion

The Rescue

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 15, 1858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a libel in rem for damage by collision with libellants’ bark. There were two-separate eases of collision, at two different times, with the same bark, charged: but the one about which there was most controversy, occurred while the libellants’ vessel was lying at the end of their wharf at Charlestown.

Read the full summary

This was a libel in rem for damage by collision with libellants’ bark. There were two-separate eases of collision, at two different times, with the same bark, charged: but the one about which there was most controversy, occurred while the libellants’ vessel was lying at the end of their wharf at Charlestown. It appeared that the steamboat was fastened alongside the ship Mercury, for the purpose-of taking her to sea, and, while endeavoring to wind her in the stream, backed her down on to the libellants’ bark, and did the damage complained of. The defence was, that the steamboat was under the…

1Opinion of the Court

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

held that the steamboat was the active power, and the ship the mere passive body, by which the damage was done, and that the proceeding, being in rem, was rightly brought against the steamer, whether she had a pilot on board or not. Decree for the libellants.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API