Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order of Special Term denying in part its application for an order striking certain items in defendant hospital’s demand for bill of particulars. We agree that Items Nos. 16, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 35, 37, 40, 41 and 42 seek evidentiary material and should be stricken. In view of counsel’s concession at oral argument concerning the remaining items in the demand, we have no occasion to pass on them. (Appeal from order of Oswego Supreme Court — protective…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elston v. CantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. KNAVEL, VICTORIA v. WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Knavel v. West Seneca Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Knavel v. West Seneca Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Knavel v. West Seneca Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API