Legal Opinion

Provenzano v. Moore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 24, 1999No. 95973PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

744 So.2d 413 (1999)

Thomas H. PROVENZANO, Petitioner,

v.

Michael W. MOORE, Respondent.

No. 95973.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 24, 1999.

Michael P. Reiter, Chief Assistant CCRC, and Mark S. Gruber, Assistant CCRC, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel —Middle Region, Tampa, Florida; and Martin J. McClain, Special Assistant CCRC, Brooklyn, New York, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Richard B. Martell, Chief, Capital Appeals, and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Katherine V. Blanco and Carol M. Dittmar, Assistant Attorneys…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Wells; Concurrence · Quince; Dissent · Shaw; Concurrence · Anstead; Dissent · Anstead; Dissent · Pariente; Concurrence · Anstead.

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Francis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API