Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Blake

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1907No. 1; Appeal, No. 57PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 57, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1904, No. 2,556, on bill in equity in case of Samuel Morrison v. William J. Blake. Bill in equity to enforce a trust. Before Sulzberger, J. The court entered a decree in accordance with the prayer of the bill. Rrror assigned in No. 57 was the decree of the court. Mrror assigned in No. 177 was order for the attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The court below found as a fact that the plaintiff and James Morrison were the real owners of the property, from the sale of which the fund in controversy arose, and that the legal title thereto had been placed in Blake, the appellant, who was their brother-in-law, simply for the convenience of these owners. Further, that the appellant had in his hands the sum of $1,800 remaining from the sale of said property, of which sum the one-half, $900, belonged to the plaintiff. A decree was accordingly made directing the appellant to pay to the plaintiff the said sum with interest,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Girard Bank v. Bank of Penn TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  2. Chew's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  3. Holmes' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Di Giacomo v. HestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Pennsylvania Co. for Ins. v. Ninth Bk. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Messmore's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Allen v. PennypackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API