Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Emp't Sec. Dep't

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2018No. 93759-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶ 1 Cynthia Stewart petitioned for judicial review of an administrative decision that she is ineligible for unemployment benefits. Her petition is not subject to the procedural statutes in the Employment Security Act (ESA), Title 50 RCW, which apply only to administrative review. Instead, her petition for judicial review is governed by the procedural statutes in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.05 RCW. And pursuant to the APA, Stewart did not timely serve her petition on the Employment Security Department (ESD). She therefore failed to invoke the superior court's appellate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friends Of Clark County And Futurewise, V Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Detention of C.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025
  3. Lakeside Industries, Inc., V. Department Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. National Parks Conservation Association v. State EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API