Legal Opinion

Kimelman v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 3, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-0675Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL KIMELMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-675 (TJK) MERRICK B. GARLAND et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Kimelman was convicted of federal securities fraud in 2011. He now lives in New York and wants to purchase and possess firearms, but his status as a felon prevents him from doing so under federal law. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) and (g)(1). Kimelman sued Defendants, the At- torney General and the Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explo- sives, seeking declaratory and injunctive…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API