Knox v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
We originally reversed and remanded this case for new trial. See Knox v. State, 471 So.2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. See State v. Knox, 495 So.2d 166 (Fla.1986). We were directed to determine if the comment involved was harmless under the standards set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and Crawford v. State, 491 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1986). We have done so and determine the error to have been harmless. Accordingly, we now affirm.
LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Knox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997