Legal Opinion

Bonner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1992No. 07-91-0287-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

This case presents the question which is of first impression in this state, whether prosecution is barred for felony delivery of a controlled substance when the complaint was filed within the limitation period but an indictment was not returned until that period had expired. For reasons hereinafter expressed, we hold prosecution is not barred and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On September 17, 1986, a complaint was filed in the trial court charging appellant with felony delivery of a controlled substance. It alleged the offense was committed on or about August 3, 1986.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Hultin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Howland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Empty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  3. Snellen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  4. State v. Jimmy Earl DrummondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Cody Will Craig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API