Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Harriman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. Motion to dismiss writ of error, Assumpsit on guardian’s bond. Defendant HincMey, impleaded as surety on the bond, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This suit was brought in the name of the judge of probate for the use of Ella A. Dodsworth, upon the bond of McCard, who was her guardian while she was a minor. The breach relied upon is the failure to pay over a certain sum of two hundred dollars, which the guardian received for his ward from the executors of the last will and testament of George B. Dennis deceased.

The will of Dennis under which this payment is claimed1 to have been made, gave to Ella A. Dodsworth, then McCard, the sum of two hundred dollars, and to other persons, also minors, other specified sums, but with provision that “…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SeelyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Guardianship of Snyder v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Perkins v. TooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API