Legal Opinion

Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 26, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

1. This court will not review the evidence in a case in which it is apparent from the record that there has been no bona fide effort made to brief the evidence as required by law, and when the document purporting to be a brief of the evidence is no brief at all, but a needlessly voluminous paper, abounding in repetition and much totally useless and irrelevant matter. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145 ; Ansley v. Davidson, 110 Ga. 279; Buchanan v. McClain, 110 Ga. 479; McLeod v. Railroad Co., 111 Ga. 859.

2. Where in such a case no question is presented which can be determined without reference to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. High & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Buchanan v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Ansley v. Davidson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Culver v. SilverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Jones v. Gate City Lodge No. 54Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API